Tech & Science Yes, Pluto is a planet

06:57  08 may  2018
06:57  08 may  2018 Source:

20-Year-Old Data Could Explain Ganymede’s Unique Magnetosphere

  20-Year-Old Data Could Explain Ganymede’s Unique Magnetosphere Jupiter’s moon Ganymede, the largest planetary satellite in the solar system, was studied by NASA’s Galileo spacecraft between 1996 and 2000. It is the only known moon with a magnetosphere.Larger than Mercury and Pluto, and twice as massive as the moon we are familiar with here on Earth, Ganymede is the largest natural planetary satellite in the solar system. It is thought to have a large subsurface ocean, sandwiched between two layers of ice and possibly containing more saltwater than all the water in Earth’s oceans.

Is Pluto a planet ? Does it qualify? For an object to be a planet , it needs to meet these three requirements defined by the IAU Therefore, yes , a planet does need to have enough gravity. So don’t be sad Pluto – I’m not a planet , but you are!

Image discovered by Xavier G. Campos. Find images and videos about space, planet and nasa on We Heart It - the app to get lost in what you love.

Pluto nearly fills the frame in this image from the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) aboard NASA's New Horizons spacecraft, taken on July 13, 2015 when the spacecraft was 476,000 miles (768,000 kilometers) from the surface.© Getty Pluto nearly fills the frame in this image from the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) aboard NASA's New Horizons spacecraft, taken on July 13, 2015 when the spacecraft was 476,000 miles (768,000 kilometers) from the surface. Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the authors', as published by our content partner, and do not represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Three years ago, NASA’s New Horizons, the fastest spaceship ever launched, raced past Pluto, spectacularly revealing the wonders of that newly seen world. This coming New Year’s Eve — if all goes well on board this small robot operating extremely far from home — it will treat us to images of the most distant body ever explored, provisionally named Ultima Thule. We know very little about it, but we do know it’s not a planet. Pluto, by contrast — despite what you’ve heard — is.

Scientists Discover Almost Completely Black Planet

  Scientists Discover Almost Completely Black Planet The dark planet only reflects 1 percent of the light hitting it.But for one planet 466 light-years away, there’s almost nothing that astronomers can measure. That’s because this planet is one of the blackest worlds ever discovered.

In my view, Pluto was a planet , is a planet , and will always be a planet . We are talking definitions here and I consider the IAU’s definition to be Does this mean there would be a large number of planets in our solar system? Yes . The reasonable question related to that is, what does it matter?

"Is Pluto a planet ? My physics teacher says it's a 2 year old re-discovery that it's a planet ." ----- There's been no change in the definition of a planet since 2006. Without trying to sound too contrarian, I'm afraid I have to disagree with both the currently top voted answers: Richard Muller's, which says yes

Why do we say this? We are planetary scientists, meaning we’ve spent our careers exploring and studying objects that orbit stars. We use “planet” to describe worlds with certain qualities. When we see one like Pluto, with its many familiar features — mountains of ice, glaciers of nitrogen, a blue sky with layers of smog — we and our colleagues quite naturally find ourselves using the word “planet” to describe it and compare it to other planets that we know and love.

In 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) announced an attempted redefinition of the word “planet” that excluded many objects, including Pluto. We think that decision was flawed, and that a logical and useful definition of planet will include many more worlds.

Meet a New Species of One of the Strangest Birds on the Planet

  Meet a New Species of One of the Strangest Birds on the Planet Meet a New Species of One of the Strangest Birds on the PlanetWhile the bird was long thought to be a single species, researchers from the Cornell Lab of Ornithology and Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology recently identified a new species, the Vogelkop superb bird-of-paradise (named for the region of New Guinea where it's found).

But how sad that poor Pluto is picked on and derided. Yes , Pluto is STILL a planet to me, and quite a wunnerful one. Click to expand It is - and it is a very fascinating world .

Pluto has more in common with other trans-Neptunian Kuiper belt objects than it does with the inner planets . It's orbit is highly eccentric and isn't within the plane of the solar system like the inner planets are. Is pluto a planet , yes or no? POLL: Should Pluto still be a planet ?

We find ourselves using the word planet to describe the largest “moons” in the solar system. Moon refers to the fact that they orbit around other worlds which themselves orbit our star, but when we discuss a world like Saturn’s Titan, which is larger than the planet Mercury, and has mountains, dunes and canyons, rivers, lakes and clouds, you will find us — in the literature and at our conferences — calling it a planet.  This usage is not a mistake or a throwback. It is increasingly common in our profession and it is accurate.

Most essentially, planetary worlds (including planetary moons) are those large enough to have pulled themselves into a ball by the strength of their own gravity. Below a certain size, the strength of ice and rock is enough to resist rounding by gravity, and so the smallest worlds are lumpy. This is how, even before New Horizons arrives, we know that Ultima Thule is not a planet. Among the few facts we’ve been able to ascertain about this body is that it is tiny (just 17 miles across) and distinctly nonspherical. This gives us a natural, physical criterion to separate planets from all the small bodies orbiting in space — boulders, icy comets or rocky and metallic asteroids, all of which are small and lumpy because their gravity is too weak for self-rounding.

NASA's newest Mars lander to study quakes on Red Planet

  NASA's newest Mars lander to study quakes on Red Planet NASA is poised to launch its first lander to Mars since 2012, an unmanned spacecraft called InSight that aims to listen for quakes and unravel the mystery of how rocky planets like Earth form. It is scheduled to launch on Saturday at 7:05 am Eastern time (1105 GMT) from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, and if all goes as planned, it should land on the Red Planet November 26.

As the outermost planet in our solar system, Pluto is also the farthest from the Sun. This planet is about all that is secret and undercover, that which is hidden from view. Is this the story of good vs. evil? Yes .

So while, yes , Pluto is incredibly small, that’s not why it lost its place as our ninth planet . Regardless, it still has a place in our solar system (and our hearts), making its way around the sun every 246 years.

The desire to reconsider the meaning of “planet” arose because of two thrilling discoveries about our universe: There are planets in unbelievable abundance beyond our solar system — called “exoplanets” — orbiting nearly every star we see in the sky. And there are a great many small icy objects orbiting our sun out in Pluto’s realm, beyond the zone of the rocky inner worlds or “terrestrial planets” (like Earth), the “gas giants” (like Jupiter) and the “ice giants” (like Neptune).

First NASA lander to study Mars' interior launches from California

  First NASA lander to study Mars' interior launches from California <p>An Atlas 5 rocket soared into space early on Saturday from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, carrying NASA's first robotic lander designed for exploring the deep interior of another planet on its voyage to Mars.</p>The Mars InSight probe lifted off from the central California coast at 4:05 a.m.PDT, treating early-rising residents across a wide swath of the state to the luminous pre-dawn spectacle of the first U.S. interplanetary spacecraft to be launched over the Pacific.

Apparently Pluto is a planet again? seems that Mercury Retrogrades want to remind us to remember and re-evaluate your past and the people you felt the old discovery connections to the past to bring to the present in starting the new ways to re-evaluate it again.

In 2006, the International Astronomical Union voted that Pluto is not a planet . I believe that was a mistake. Here are nine reasons why Pluto is a planet . So, if we adopt a purely geophysical classification, does that make the gravitationally-rounded moons out to be planets ? Yes , it does.

In light of these discoveries, it did then make sense to ask which objects discovered orbiting other stars should be considered planets. Some, at the largest end, are more like stars themselves. And just as stars like our sun are known as “dwarf stars” and still considered stars, it made some sense to consider small icy worlds like Pluto to occupy another subcategory of planet: “dwarf planet.”

But the process for redefining planet was deeply flawed and widely criticized even by those who accepted the outcome. At the 2006 IAU conference, which was held in Prague, the few scientists remaining at the very end of the week-long meeting (less than 4 percent of the world’s astronomers and even a smaller percentage of the world’s planetary scientists) ratified a hastily drawn definition that contains obvious flaws. For one thing, it defines a planet as an object orbiting around our sun — thereby disqualifying the planets around other stars, ignoring the exoplanet revolution, and decreeing that essentially all the planets in the universe are not, in fact, planets.

Even within our solar system, the IAU scientists defined “planet” in a strange way, declaring that if an orbiting world has “cleared its zone,” or thrown its weight around enough to eject all other nearby objects, it is a planet. Otherwise it is not. This criterion is imprecise and leaves many borderline cases, but what’s worse is that they chose a definition that discounts the actual physical properties of a potential planet, electing instead to define “planet” in terms of the other objects that are — or are not — orbiting nearby. This leads to many bizarre and absurd conclusions. For example, it would mean that Earth was not a planet for its first 500 million years of history, because it orbited among a swarm of debris until that time, and also that if you took Earth today and moved it somewhere else, say out to the asteroid belt, it would cease being a planet.

The debate over Pluto will never die. Here’s the latest argument for why it’s a planet.

  The debate over Pluto will never die. Here’s the latest argument for why it’s a planet. Scientists’ potential new definition of “planet” includes Pluto — and at least a 100 other objects in the solar system. In 2006, Pluto was demoted from a full-fledged planet to a dwarf planet. The reason: Pluto wasn’t special anymore. Astronomers had discovered many other Pluto-size objects in Pluto’s section of the solar system, called the Kuiper belt. If Pluto was a planet, why wasn’t Eris? Or Haumea or Makemake? As Vox explained in 2015, there are likely dozens more yet-to-be-discovered Pluto-size objects in the Kuiper belt.

"Is pluto a dwarf planet ?" Yes . "What gives the IAU the right to make Pluto a dwarf planet ?" They are the international body charged with doing so. That includes comets, asteroids, and other astronomical objects as well.

Well, then, is Pluto a planet ? Yes , it appears to be a planet . But it is reasonable to qualify that by saying that Pluto is not a major planet because it is simply too small to be a major planet (though the pride of many American astronomers causes them to continue to fight politically for Pluto to be called

To add insult to injury, they amended their convoluted definition with the vindictive and linguistically paradoxical statement that “a dwarf planet is not a planet.” This seemingly served no purpose but to satisfy those motivated by a desire — for whatever reason — to ensure that Pluto was “demoted” by the new definition.

By and large, astronomers ignore the new definition of “planet” every time they discuss all of the exciting discoveries of planets orbiting other stars. And those of us who actually study planets for a living also discuss dwarf planets without adding an asterisk. But it gets old having to address the misconceptions among the public who think that because Pluto was “demoted” (not exactly a neutral term) that it must be more like a lumpy little asteroid than the complex and vibrant planet it is. It is this confusion among students and the public — fostered by journalists and textbook authors who mistakenly accepted the authority of the IAU as the final word — that makes this worth addressing.

Last March, in Houston, planetary scientists gathered to share new results and ideas at the annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. One presentation, titled “A Geophysical Planet Definition,” intended to set the record straight. It stated: “In keeping with both sound scientific classification and peoples’ intuition, we propose a geophysically-based definition of 'planet' that importantly emphasizes a body’s intrinsic physical properties over its extrinsic orbital properties.” After giving a precise and nerdy definition, it offered: “A simple paraphrase of our planet definition — especially suitable for elementary school students — could be, ‘round objects in space that are smaller than stars.’”

It seems very likely that at some point the IAU will reconsider its flawed definition. In the meantime, people will keep referring to the planets being discovered around other stars as planets, and we’ll keep referring to round objects in our solar system and elsewhere as planets. Eventually, “official” nomenclature will catch up to both common sense and scientific usage. The word “planet” predates and transcends science. Language is malleable and responsive to culture. Words are not defined by voting. Neither is scientific paradigm.

David Grinspoon is an astrobiologist who studies climate evolution and habitability of other worlds. Alan Stern is the principal investigator of the New Horizons mission to Pluto and the Kuiper belt. Their book “Chasing New Horizons: Inside the Epic First Mission to Pluto,” was published May 1 by Picador.

Astronomers Photograph "Toddler Planet" .
Astronomers Photograph "Toddler Planet"Now, astronomers think they've caught a glimpse of that process in action just hundreds of light-years away from Earth, according to a new paper accepted for publication by the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!