Money We Buy Houses breached Australian Consumer Law with 'buy a house for $1' claim, judge says

08:00  13 august  2017
08:00  13 august  2017 Source:   abc.net.au

The Block gets house proud for new season

  The Block gets house proud for new season One of Australia's most popular TV shows The Block is back with a new season, and this year it's the return of the house renovation.The Nine Network stalwart is returning for a 13th season after continuous ratings success, but it's not as though the producers are resting on their laurels.

A Federal Court judge finds a company claiming it could help Australians buy a house for a dollar engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct.

^ " We Buy Houses breached Australian Consumer Law with ' buy a house for $ 1 ' claim , judge says ". ^ Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v We Buy Houses Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 915 (11 August 2017), Federal Court.

Rick Otton's company We Buy Houses had a turnover of more than $20 million.© Facebook Rick Otton's company We Buy Houses had a turnover of more than $20 million.

A businessman who claimed his clients could "buy a house for $1" engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct, and contravened Australian Consumer Law.

Why Aussie retail sales are on the rise across the country

  Why Aussie retail sales are on the rise across the country Australians are spending more this winter with retail sales rising for a third straight month. Blaming booming house prices for an increase in consumer confidence, economists are pointing to homeowners who are leading the charge."While we are feeling a lot of doom and gloom in the economy, homeowners are feeling more confident and they are certainly putting more money into their home to make it more comfortable and more valuable as well," consumer advocate Christopher Zinn told 9NEWS.Across Australia, retail spending grew by 0.3 percent in June to $26.2 billion, with New South Wales seeing a 0.5 percent rise.

^ " We Buy Houses breached Australian Consumer Law with ' buy a house for $ 1 ' claim , judge says ". ^ Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v We Buy Houses Pty Ltd[2017] FCA 915 (11 August 2017), Federal Court.

Consumer Affairs Forum. The Australian Consumer Law . – The ACL provides that certain breaches of the law are sufficiently serious such that they may be treated as criminal offences, to which criminal sanctions apply.

Rick Otton's company We Buy Houses (WBH) had a turnover of more than $20 million.

Between January 2011 and June 2014, 3,400 people attended free seminars, 2,000 paid to attend a boot camp to learn more information, and 700 did a more expensive course with mentors.

Today, however, a Federal Court Judge found Otton and WBH engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct and contravened Australian Consumer Law.

Consumer sentiment on the Australian economy just came crashing back to earth

  Consumer sentiment on the Australian economy just came crashing back to earth Consumer sentiment in Australia fell sharply last week as Australian household's views towards the broader economy reversed the previous week's gains.The ANZ-Roy Morgan Australian Consumer Confidence Index dived by 4%, driven by steep falls in the view toward current and future economic conditions.

The other party may then have a legal claim against the breaching party. the buyer selling his or her current house , and. the seller successfully finding another house to move into. An arbitrator, mediator, or small claims court judge would then decide the matter according to the provisions of the

Australian contract law concerns the legal enforcement of promises that were made as part of a bargain freely entered into, forming a legal relationship called a contract. The common law in Australia is based on the inherited English contract law

Justice Jacqueline Gleeson concluded there was no evidence that the strategies spruiked by the sole director and his company could enable a consumer to buy a house for $1.

"The headline 'how to buy a house for $1' indicates that [WBH and Otton] were directing their efforts principally towards people who were not property rich, but who would be attracted to the idea that they could make money from property without having to pay a significant amount for it," Justice Gleeson said.

"The message is sensational. It is designed to attract the attention of consumers who do not have sufficient financial resources to buy a house using mainstream bank finance."

Global giant Unilever snaps up ice cream icon Weis

  Global giant Unilever snaps up ice cream icon Weis Global food giant Unilever has snapped up Australian ice cream company Weis, maker of the iconic Mango and Cream Bar. The Dutch-British consumer goods company said on Wednesday it had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the Queensland company.Unilever already owns the Streets ice cream and more than 400 other consumer brands from around the world, including Lipton, Bushells, Dove, Rexona and Ben & Jerry's. Les Weis founded Weis in Toowoomba, Queensland, in 1957, and plied local movie-goers with his "Fruito Bars".

3. Position on the lot. A house doesn't exist in space. It is surrounded by trees, other homes and terrain. Generally speaking, it's much better to buy the worst house in the neighborhood than the best. The economy: home prices, jobless claims rise.

P The judges in the House of Lords are known as Law Lords. This is required when selling to consumers . To sell to 9 GOVERNING a consumer without this phrase would 1 Damages, in a legal sense, are the sum of money the law imposes for a breach of some duty or violation of some right.

WBH boot camps 'an expensive waste of time'

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [ACCC] had alleged that WBH's further claims that a consumer could buy a house without needing a deposit, bank loan or experience, start making profits immediately, and create wealth were also misleading and deceptive.

Consumers enticed by WBH were given a variety of strategies and tips to achieve property ownership — some of which included "rent-to-buy", a "sandwich lease option" involving a middleman, and "sweat equity" option, where the buyer carries out renovations in lieu of paying a deposit.

Would-be investors would be drip-fed the strategies, with WBH giving some information at the initial free session, then delivering more as consumers paid $3,000 to attend the boot camp, then $26,000 to attend mentoring workshops.

"For ordinary consumers seeking how to achieve the outcomes stated ... the free seminars were a waste of time," Justice Gleeson said.

Tradies allege 'worm' owes them half a million dollars

  Tradies allege 'worm' owes them half a million dollars A group of contractors has joined forces to pursue the man they claim hired them to build a service station and then refused to pay them almost half a million dollars they were owed. The contractors say Frank Nadinic, who at the time worked for Subcontracting Services trading as Octane Australia Pty Ltd, presented them with a brief to build a United service station.Although Mr Nadinic was not a director of Subcontracting Services - which has since entered voluntary liquidation - the contractors claim he ran the project and signed crucial documents.Now, they claim, hundreds of thousands of dollars are still owed.

CONSUMERLAW A. COMMON LAW APPROACH TO CONSUMER PROTECTION Tort: Elements of Deceit/Fraud 1 . 24  Facts: Δ contracted to buy П's house for k. Δ had put down k in earnest money. The П can proceed on the fraud claim because of superior knowledge and experience.

Home/PROPERTY LAW / Buying a House . Michael now has a specialist law practice providing a faster and lower cost conveyancing service for Irish consumers whether you are buying or selling a property or doing both at the same time.

"For those ordinary consumers the boot camps and the Go Direct programs were an expensive waste of time." Justice Gleeson accepted that some of the WBH strategies were theoretically possible, but added there was no evidence they had been used by its students successfully.

None of WBH's most successful students, known as "big kahunas", provided evidence to the court to show what they had claimed to have achieved, and while a number of testimonials were shown to the court, the judge said there was no evidence of the claims in them.

ACCC witnesses talk of failures

The ACCC called nine consumers as witnesses to describe how they had been to WBH sessions but never achieved success by implementing what they learned.

WBH's lawyers said people who could not make the strategies work did not persist, applied the strategies to commercial properties, tried to buy properties that were too expensive, or tried to combine strategies against the advice provided.

During court proceedings Otton's own investment success and the representations he made about it were questioned extensively.

"Despite claiming that Mr Otton had been successful financially "in following these ideas and strategies", there was almost no evidence that [Mr Otton and WBH] had used the strategies, let alone used them to make money," Justice Gleeson said.

"There was no evidence that the respondents had bought a property since 2006. "I conclude that, in reality, the respondents' strategies do not and cannot enable a consumer to buy a house without needing a deposit, bank loan or real estate experience."

ACCC cracks down on 'unacceptable' NBN speed ads .
Internet providers will have to "tell the truth" about minimum download speeds on the NBN after the competition watchdog responded to consumer confusion.The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has moved to protect NBN customers from misleading broadband speed offers, paving the way for providers to be prosecuted for misleading claims, such as ads using "best-case-scenario" broadband speeds.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!